on the ramp

priority
1
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
19 Jan 2009
description

"Warning: mysqli_stmt::bind_param() [mysqli-stmt.bind-param]: Number of variables doesn't match number of parameters in prepared statement in /www/htdocs/w00a7e44/sites/SITENAME/plugins/codesense_mysqli.php on line 46
Bind parameters failed"

 

Maybe the bug is already here, but I'm in a hurry.

priority
2
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
31 Mar 2007
description

Request-URI Too Large

The requested URL's length exceeds the capacity limit for this server.

request failed: URI too long


Apache/1.3 Server at sirkos.domainfactory.de Port 80

is
what I see, when I try the preview function on my recent post. The uri is not at all long, only the post is. I don't know if that is causing a problem
# lastedited 18 May 2007 comments(5)
priority
2
author
nic
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
14 Dec 2007
description
The title says what I know about it. I hate it, but I'll have to throw on ye old IE and look at it...
priority
2
author
nic
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
15 Feb 2008
description
I don't know right now what would be the best way to do that ( a validation?), but it can lead to problems.
priority
2
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
15 May 2008
description

We spoke about this.

When I link to A from B, C and D, at the moment we get to see »links to A« when we look at either B, C, or D.

It would be nice, if we automatically also saw »linked to from B, C, D« when we look at A.

# lastedited 15 May 2008 add a comment
priority
2
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
19 May 2008
description
I just noticed that here on this very site when you show search options, under »inputdate« Polly offers all the versions. That is not right.
priority
2
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
28 Aug 2008
description

It works with n → m relations, but not with 1 → 1 relations

priority
2
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
28 Aug 2008
description

On a pagwide search (not sidewide), only inforations are shown that the user had specyfied in the search. Plus n→m, which doesn't really belong there.

# lastedited 28 Aug 2008 comments(2)
priority
3
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
08 Feb 2007
description
A matter of aesthetics, really. On my server I don't have the popup login thing but a page where the two fields are integrated in the code somehow (if you don't know what I mean, try to log on at the brasserie).
Would it be a lot of work to put the two fields in a data-tag of a real page? If yes, just drop the whole issue, if it would be easy, I think it would definitely increase the pleasure of login on.

08.02.07
But they are within a tag with id "data":
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="data">
...
The only difference to the normal markup I can think of is that the form as another id ? (login_form instead of edit_form or sthg like that...)

8.2.07
Sorry, I did not express myself clearly enough: What I was asking for was a complete page that is built from the template with the login stuff as content.
The way it looks does not bother too much for the brasserie, as it is plain grey, but for the bamboo skin for instance it does not look very nice.

09.02.07
Hm, the template is structure intermengled with content - hard to pull those apart to fill other content in - seems too much work :-(

9.2.07
Just curious: How do you get all the admin stuff in a page written from the template?

09.02.07
you call index.php or edit.php in the admin-directory.
Both (like the "regular" index.php) do their thing and then provide a method called writeData().
That method writes the content for that page but is not called here.
Then they include the template. Including means "pretend that this other PHP-File would be a part of you, PHP file!"
The template, then, calls writeData() - it can safely assume it's there.
Understandable?
The template
# lastedited 17 Oct 2007 comments(4)
priority
3
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
28 May 2007
description
I just started deleting the spam comments, but stopped after the first one because it is too tedious with a 56k modem. The reason for that is the many steps you need to delete a single item:
  1. click "delete"
  2. click "yes" for "do you really..."
  3. click "back to list view"
I know it would be much faster with a fast connection, but still. So: Would it be possible and would you consider it helpful to add little tick boxes to the list of comments where you could tick all the spam and go "delete", do you really want to delete these 256 items? "Yes" and end?
# lastedited 30 May 2007 comments(1)
priority
3
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
10 Feb 2008
description
In all the comments I see »\'« (BackslashApostrophe) when I mean »'« (Apostrophe). We had this issue before. It also happens in the search. Search for »\'« and after the search you see »\\'« in the searchbox. Doesn't happen in title nor entry.
# lastedited 10 Feb 2008 add a comment
priority
4
author
nic
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
18 Dec 2006
description
Occurs when table was deleted.
To reproduce: delete a table (that is used by a multipage) then list multipages
# lastedited 18 Dec 2006 add a comment
priority
4
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
05 Jul 2007
description

Seems there is a problem in FCK under Windows (2000). When you select a word and try to make it a link using fck, the selected word disappears. The URL shows up instead and in source view you get two anchor tags.

Ubuntu doesn't have that problem (as long as ubuntu works...)

Used FF on both occasions.

# lastedited 05 Jul 2007 comments(1)
priority
4
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
30 Dec 2007
description

When one defines a step (say 10), the visitor only gets to see the first ten entries of a page. Then, at the bottom, one reads: »you are seeing a selection of all entries on this page. Click to see all there are.« After a click I do see al entries but I start at the top of the page again.

It would be neat if I would be forwarded directly to entry 11 when I clicked the link after entry 10.

priority
4
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
10 Feb 2008
description

Do you think it would be helpful to have something like

if (comment_bla == '')  echo comment_website

in comment administration? Spam stuff tends not to bother with content, so when you delete it, you don't see what you're actually deleting (not that it matters, but still), but only red X's floating next to each other.

# lastedited 10 Feb 2008 comments(1)
priority
4
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
14 May 2008
description

On related entities, it says in English »related« and in German »verbundene« + Tablename. This can result in odd combinations such as »verbundene customer« when the table names are in English but the site is in German or »verbundene Kunde« when the table name is singular. We should

  1. find a way that does not require KNG-Kongruenz (whatever that is in English), like »verbunden mit«
  2. use not the table name but the page name relating to the table in question (if possible)
priority
4
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
25 Sep 2008
description

If not, present something meaningful.

# lastedited 25 Sep 2008 add a comment
priority
4
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
06 Oct 2008
description

When a page fits into the browser window so it doesn't have a horizontal scrollbar, the bar will still appear when hovering over the right border of the browser window.

It happens in all pages that have the script linked in the head.

It only happens before the script is being called in a link. After a hover-over-pop-up appeared for the first time on a page, the behaviour is gone. The behaviour is back after reloading the page.

priority
5
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
06 Feb 2007
description
After loading a page and then moving the mouse I very often (not always) get an error message from Firebug:
skin is not defined       popup.js (line 96)
skin.left = x + "px";

21.02.2007
maybe that happens because skin or nudge() are defined after get_mouse().
I'll try moving get_mouse() to the end of the script...


# lastedited 18 May 2007 add a comment
priority
5
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
09 Jul 2007
description
What would you think about getting rid of "www" in the set of information about commentators and instead assign a link to the name when a url is being provided (like here for instance)?
# lastedited 09 Jul 2007 add a comment
priority
5
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
27 Sep 2007
description

I always felt that the system of content, comment and feed administration was a bit clumsy. When I hit "feeds" for instance, the feeds are sorted chronologically but within put into groups.

i just spit out some rough ideas I had, let me know what you think.

How about this: When you go to "content" in the admin area, you pick a page from the dropdown list. Why don't we make three groups with headings:

Content: The stuff how you see it now

Comments: All comments from this page grouped into the entries they belong to

Feeds: feeds.

This way everything would be nicely together.

Another option I would like, would be having a link "comments" under each entry in the list. When you click on that, the java script thing happens (the one that works for captcha in "the system" for instance) and you get the comments of the according entry.

# lastedited 27 Sep 2007 comments(2)
priority
5
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
10 Feb 2008
description
In »pages«, the position of the java script hover over popup for »new complex page« is out of place (positioned too high). Tested only when »new complex page link« is inactive so far.
priority
5
author
jan
version
n.y.i.
inputdate
10 Feb 2008
description

I'm setting it to priority 5 because I couldn't reproduce it today.

When I set up the brushruner site, in the process I frequently had empty lines showing up in the pages dropdown under »content« and corresponding empty pages without heading. I was able to see a pattern then, but whatever I do now it doesn't happen anymore.

# lastedited 10 Feb 2008 add a comment
You are seeing a selection of all entries on this page. See all there are.